International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|July 2008|Volume 7 Issue 5|
International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

July 2008

Volume 7, Issue 5

 

 

In this Issue

 

Articles

 

Case Summaries

 

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 


 


Welcome to the July 2008 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other points of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

 

If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.

 

Please click here to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters.

 

Regards,

 

David Zaslowsky

Co-Editor

 

Grant Hanessian

Co-Editor


Articles

 

Our first featured article discusses a case in which a New York federal district court held that the  whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act can apply to employees outside the United States.  This is the first time that a U.S. court has applied those provisions extraterritorially.  The article was written by Robert Lewis of our New York office and Denise Broussal of our Paris Office.

 

> Read More   > Back to Top

 

Our second featured article takes a close look at the use of Witness Statements in arbitration.  The article was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.

 

> Read More   > Back to Top


Case Summaries

 

Alien Tort Statute.  Vienna Convention.  Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Article 36 of Vienna Convention Creates Individual Rights.

>Read More

 

Arbitration.  Appellate Jurisdiction.  Second Circuit dismisses appeal of district court's interlocutory order for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

>Read More

 

Choice of Law.  Court applies Swiss substantive law and New York procedural law in dispute involving the ownership of an Egon Schiele drawing.

>Read More

 

Confirmation of Arbitral Awards.  District Court holds that domestic courts engage in the same inquiry when considering a motion to dismiss a petition to vacate and a motion to confirm an arbitral award; therefore, courts may construe, even sua sponte, opposition to a petition to vacate as a motion to confirm.

>Read More

 

Enforceability of International Court of Justice Decision.  Supremacy Clause.  Supreme Court holds that an International Court of Justice decision rendered pursuant to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and its Optional Protocol is not directly enforceable as domestic law in U.S. state courts, and that a memorandum of the President supporting the decision similarly does not bind U.S. state courts.

>Read More

 

Federal Arbitration Act.  Equitable Estoppel.  Interlocutory Appeals.  Appellate Jurisdiction.  Appellate court holds it has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal taken from order denying request to compel international arbitration, and that signatory to arbitration agreement is equitably estopped from resisting a non- signatory's motion to compel arbitration.

>Read More

 

Federal Arbitration Act.  Scope of "Arbitration."  Stay Pending Arbitration. Eleventh Circuit holds that "mediation" is not arbitration within the Federal Arbitration Act.

>Read More

 

Forum non conveniens.  District Court of Kansas denies U.S. aircraft manufacturer's motion for forum non conveniens-based dismissal of Canadian residents' claims arising from aircraft crash in Canada.

>Read More

 

Forum selection and forum non conveniens.  District Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, in favor of Germany.

>Read More

 

Forum Selection Clause.  New York district court finds that forum selection clause was properly invoked by a successor corporation to dismiss claims of tortious interference and unjust enrichment.

>Read More

 

Interpleader.  Sovereign Immunity.  Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(b).  Supreme Court holds that Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 19(a) and (b) require dismissal of an interpleader action involving a foreign country that has successfully claimed sovereign immunity.

>Read More

 

Judgments.  Orders in Satisfaction of Judgment.  To satisfy New York state court judgment, court permits turnover of foreign judgment debtor's stock certificates, bank accounts and other personal property located outside of New York.

>Read More

 

Personal Jurisdiction.  General Jurisdiction.  Action against Canadian Defendants dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction where Plaintiffs could not show Defendants' substantial, continuous, or systematic contacts with the forum.

>Read More

 

Service of Process.  Court dismisses foreign defendant for Plaintiff's improper and untimely service.

>Read More

 

Sherman Act.  Clayton Act.  Robinson-Patman Act.  Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.  Federal District Court Dismisses Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Antitrust Standing.

>Read More   > Back to Top

Privacy Policy 


This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group
130 E. Randolph Drive

Chicago, IL  60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/59U7899CFl79vLV