International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|May 2004|Volume 3, Issue 4|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

May 2004
Volume 3, Issue 4

 

 

 

In this Issue

 

Articles

 

Case Summaries

 

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 

Related Links

North American Litigation Practice Group Web Site


 


Welcome to the May 2004 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other points of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

 

I have always found comments from readers to be the single best source for improving the Newsletter. If you have any suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to me by clicking on my email link below.

 

If you would like to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters, please click on the "subscribe" link to the left and select the newsletters that interest you.

 

Thanks,

 

David Zaslowsky

Editor


Articles

 

Disputes under bilateral and multilateral investment treaties are often resolved in ICSID arbitrations. Our first featured article provides a general look at when ICSID arbitration might be available. The article was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.

Read More

 

The second article looks at the possibility of using "umbrella clauses" in investment treaties as a basis for turning a breach of contract lawsuit into an ICSID arbitration. This article was written by Jeremy Winter of our London office.
Read More     > Back to Top


Case Summaries

 

Antisuit Injunctions. First Circuit articulates its standard for granting antisuit injunctions and affirms antisuit injunction against further proceedings by Defendant in Belgium.

> Read More
 
Arbitration. Arbitrability. Consumers required to arbitrate Magnuson-Moss warranty claim.

> Read More 
  
Arbitration. Stay of Enforcement. District court decided to wait for the results of an appeal in Dubai before deciding whether to enforce a decision from a court in Dubai overturning an arbitration award on the ground that witness oaths were not administered properly.

> Read More
  
Arbitration. Stay. Second Circuit affirms district court's holding that, under a California statute, an arbitration would be stayed pending completion of a related litigation.

> Read More
  
Arbitration. Modification of Award. Under Colorado's version of the Uniform Arbitration Act, an arbitrator's right to modify or clarify an award is no broader than that of the court.   

> Read More
  
Arbitration. Subpoena. Third Circuit reverses district court and holds that the FAA does not permit pre-hearing subpoenas against non-parties.  

> Read More
  
Clayton Act. There was personal jurisdiction over some, but not all, Canadian defendants accused of violating the Sherman Act with respect to the sale of cars.  

> Read More
  
Forum Non Conveniens. Motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens granted with respect to foreign plaintiffs and denied with respect to U.S. resident plaintiffs.  

> Read More
  
FSIA. Amended FSIA and the Flatow Amendment only provide private right of action against officials, employees, and agents of a foreign state, not the state itself.  

> Read More
  
Hague Convention. Court affirms district court's decision permiting service by mail upon English defendant  

> Read More
  
Hague Service Convention. State Court action dismissed against English corporation that was not served in accordance with the provisions of the Hague Service Convention.  

> Read More
  
Personal Jurisdiction. Representation of Virginia hockey players did not create general jurisdiction under Virginia long-arm.  

> Read More
  
Section 1782. Seventh Circuit reverses district court and holds that § 1782 cannot be used to obtain documents from non-party subsidiaries of a U.S. corporation.   
> Read More     > Back to Top

 

Privacy Policy



This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group

130 E. Randolph Drive

Chicago, IL  60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/81U28j30CXt31nc816