International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|January 2007|Volume 6 Issue 2|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

January 2007

Volume 6, Issue 2

In this Issue


Articles

Case Summaries

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 

 


Welcome to the January 2007 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other matters of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.

If you would like to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters, please click on the "subscribe" link to the left and select the newsletters that interest you.

Regards,

David Zaslowsky
Co-Editor

Grant Hanessian
Co-Editor


Articles

The general rule in the United States is that forum selection clauses will be enforced, especially in international transactions. Our featured article looks at some exceptions to that general rule. The article was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office. 
 

> Read More     > Back to Top

 


Case Summaries

Antisuit Injunction. Forum Selection Clause. District court grants motion to enjoin suit in Costa Rica.
> Read More

 

Antitrust. Standing. Supplemental Jurisdiction. Court holds that Plaintiffs lack standing to bring claims under European Union law, where none of the plaintiffs are from the European Union, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction when all claims granting original jurisdiction have been dismissed.
> Read More

 

Antitrust. Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Standing. "Ripple effects" of competitor's foreign conduct on the U.S. market not the type of direct causation contemplated by the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982.
> Read More

 

Arbitration. Anti-suit Injunctions. Southern District of New York refuses to enjoin Chilean company from asserting claims in Chilean court concurrently with arbitration in New York.
> Read More

 

Attorney-client Privilege. Where no privilege was provided by Swiss law, district court held that conversations between Plaintiffs and their Swiss patent agents and Swiss in-house counsel were discoverable.
> Read More

 

Attorneys' Fees. District court holds that English Rule applies where contracts contain English choice of law provision.
> Read More

 

Conflict of Laws. Tort. Seventh Circuit affirms dismissal of complaint by Illinois resident for injury in Bahamas, holding that Bahamian law applied to the dispositive issue in the case.
> Read More

 

Diversity Jurisdiction. Forum Non Conveniens. Seventh Circuit holds that, for diversity purposes, a U.S. permanent resident is a dual citizen of both his home state and his country of actual citizenship and suggests that a plaintiff's choice of forum is not entitled to the usual deference where the parties all trade worldwide.
> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Eleventh Circuit reverses district court and holds that the failure to pay a monetary reward for information falls within the commercial activity exception of the FSIA.
> Read More

 

Forum Non Conveniens. Southern District of New York denies motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens where Defendant's primary defense was one of U.S. corporate law.
> Read More

 

Hague Evidence Convention. Discovery of documents located in France could be compelled from a non-party pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and resort to the Hague Evidence Convention was not necessary.
> Read More

 

Hague Service Convention. Court grants in part and denies in part a third-party plaintiff's motion for appointment of agent for service of process abroad. 
> Read More

 

Patents. District court properly asserted jurisdiction in preliminarily enjoining the import of certain lens fitted film packages, since action was not one to contest the International Trade Commission's denial of an importer's challenge to a general exclusion order, in which case only the Court of International Trade would have had exclusive jurisdiction.
> Read More

 

Personal Jurisdiction. District court dismisses complaint against foreign corporations where Defendants did not have sufficient contacts with New York or control subsidiaries present in New York.
> Read More

 

Personal Jurisdiction. Res Judicata. Collateral Estoppel. Selection of Suit Clause. Wisconsin district court reverses previous finding of personal jurisdiction over English reinsurer.
> Read More

 

Section 1782. District court grants Section 1782 application for discovery in aid of foreign arbitration.
> Read More

 

Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Foreign purchaser of American Depository Shares traded in the U.S. exposed itself to subject matter jurisdiction by filing documents required under Section 13(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
> Read More

 

Treaties. U.N. Convention Against Torture was not self-executing and did not create a private cause of action for domestic plaintiff.
> Read More

 

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods ("CISG"). Eleventh Circuit affirms decision that, under the CISG, the definition given to a contractual term through the parties' course of dealing trumps a general usage in the trade.

> Read More    > Back to Top

 

 

Privacy Policy

This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group
130 E. Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL 60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/91809891ijUe795830