International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|January 2006|Volume 5 Issue 2|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

January 2006
Volume 5, Issue 2

 

In this Issue

 

Articles

Case Summaries

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 

Related Links

North American Litigation Practice Group Web Site


Welcome to the January 2006 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other matters of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

 

If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.

 

 

Regards,

 

David Zaslowsky

Co-Editor

 

Grant Hanessian

Co-Editor


Article

 

Enforcing International Arbitration Agreements


Our featured article this edition discusses lessons to be learned by practitioners who consider themselves knowledgeable on the subject of international arbitration . It was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.
> Read More          > Back to Top


Case Summaries

Alien Tort Claims Act. Torture Victim Protection Act.  District court dismissed claims under the ATCA and TVPA. State law tort claims allowed to proceed against Exxon Mobil entities.

> Read More

Anti-Terrorism Act. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act was denied based on allegations that Defendant: (1) provided banking services to agents of terrorist organizations; (2) acted as exclusive administrator of "death and dismemberment benefit plan;" and (3) knowingly provided "material support" and financing to terrorist organizations.

> Read More

Arbitration. A district court may not compel arbitration in another district, and it may not compel arbitration in its own district if the arbitration agreement calls for arbitration outside its district.

> Read More

Arbitration. Res judciata applied to an arbitration award to bar subsequent litigation.

> Read More

Arbitration. Federal Court Jurisdiction. Insurance policy containing clause calling for arbitration in London provided basis for federal court jurisdiction notwithstanding an inconsistent state statute.

> Read More

Arbitration. Provisional Remedies. In a contract with an ambiguous choice-of-law provision, the First Circuit applied federal law in denying a request for injunctive relief in aid of arbitration.

> Read More

Arbitration. Standard of Review. First Circuit determined that the Federal Arbitration Act's judicial review provisions can be displaced only where explicit contractual language demonstrates the parties' clear intent to subject the arbitral award to a different standard of review.

> Read More

Clayton Act Service of Process. Second Circuit holds that worldwide service of process as permitted in antitrust cases by the Clayton Act is limited by the statute's venue requirements.

> Read More

Discovery. District court refused to compel depositions of Defendant's Canadian employees where Plaintiff gave notice only two weeks before close of discovery in a price-fixing class action.

> Read More

Foreign Judgments. First Amendment prevents enforcement of foreign judgment awarding damages for online display of photographs of designers' clothing.

> Read More

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Wavier of sovereign immunity in underlying action constituted waiver of immunity with respect to law firm's charging lien.

> Read More

Forum Non Conveniens. Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an action on grounds of forum non conveniens but modified the District Court's judgment to allow plaintiffs to reinstate the action if the New Delhi High Court proved to be an inadequate alternative forum.

> Read More

Internet. Personal Jurisdiction. District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction where ownership, operation and submission of comments to a website by Canadian and out-of-state residents did not manifest an intent to target the forum state.

> Read More

Personal Jurisdiction. Foreign defendants did not consent to U.S. personal jurisdiction based on "forum selection" legislation or based on defenses raised in prior U.S. lawsuits.

> Read More

Personal Jurisdiction. Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(2). A trial court may not resolve disputed jurisdictional facts against the plaintiff and dismiss the plaintiff's case for lack of personal jurisdiction unless it first conducts an evidentiary hearing and makes findings.

> Read More

Section 1782. District Court rejects the extraterritorial application of 28 U.S.C. § 1782.

> Read More

Tag Jurisdiction. District court did not permit post-judgment discovery from corporation not subject to New York jurisdiction but did permit discovery from corporate officers who were served in New York.

> Read More          > Back to Top

Privacy Policy

This e-mail was sent by:

North American Litigation Practice Group

130 E. Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/MK28813062939995g638