International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|May 2007|Volume 6 Issue 4|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

May 2007

Volume 6, Issue 4

 

In this Issue


Articles

Case Summaries

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 

 


Welcome to the May 2007 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other matters of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.
.
Regards,

David Zaslowsky
Co-Editor

Grant Hanessian
Co-Editor


Article
Cross-Examination In International Arbitration

Our featured article this month looks at the practice of cross-examination in international arbitration. It was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.

 

> Read More

 

 


Case Summaries


Admiralty Rule B. Both the originator and the beneficiary of an electronic fund transfer hold a property interest in the transfer subject to attachment under Rule B.
> Read More

 

Anti-Suit Injunction. Second Circuit upholds district court's decision to grant anti-suit injunction but modifies the injunction.

> Read More

 

Application of Foreign Law. Fifth Circuit partially reverses district court dismissal of breach of contract claim after improper application of Japanese law.
> Read More

 

Arbitration. District Court applied English law in holding that there was no right to compel arbitration.

> Read More

 

Arbitration. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards. Court dismisses petition to enforce an award for lack of personal jurisdiction over sovereign respondent

> Read More

   
Confirmation of Arbitration Award. Eleventh Circuit upholds arbitration award requiring Respondent to terminate collateral proceedings in foreign jurisdictions

> Read More

   
Famous Marks Doctrine. Court of Appeals rejects the famous marks doctrine.

> Read More

   
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Court has duty to consider FSIA jurisdiction sua sponte as FSIA immunity is a claim protecting foreign instrumentalities from the burdens of litigation.

> Read More

   
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Fifth Circuit agrees that a Japanese company was not an organ of the government of Japan. 

> Read More

   
Forum Non Conveniens. For purposes of U.S. law, an alternative forum may not become unavailable by way of fraud.  

> Read More

   
Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate court in Texas affirms dismissal on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction. 

> Read More

   
Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Southern District of New York dismisses bondholder's complaint against the People's Republic of China ("PRC") holding that the PRC was entitled to sovereign immunity and the statute of limitations had expired.

> Read More

   
Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Lanham Act. Purported violations of the Lanham Act occurring entirely outside of the United States, and not affecting U.S. commerce, were outside the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.  

> Read More

   
Supplemental Jurisdiction. Comity. Federal Circuit finds that there is no supplemental jurisdiction over claims based on foreign patents..

> Read More

   
> Back to Top

 

Privacy Policy

This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group

130 E. Randolph Drive

Chicago, IL  60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/YUq819171vo65keR