International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|September 2006|Volume 5 Issue 6|
International Litigation & Arbitration
|
 |
|
 |

|
|
Welcome to the September 2006 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other matters of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.
If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.
If you would like to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters, please click on the ""subscribe"" link to the left and select the newsletters that interest you.
Regards,
David Zaslowsky Co-Editor
Grant Hanessian Co-Editor
|
|
Article
There is a perception by some outside the United States that, under the "manifest disregard" standard, U.S. courts regularly review the merits of arbitration awards. In this month's article, we take a closer look at this judicially created doctrine for vacating awards. The article was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.
> Read More > Back to Top |
|
Case Summaries
Act of State Doctrine. The Helms-Burton Act does not affect the application of the act of state doctrine to claims not brought under that act. > Read More
Alien Tort Claims Act. Ninth Circuit reverses district court and holds that the US courts have jurisdiction over a claim under the ATCA. > Read More
Anti-Suit Injunction. Forum Selection Clauses. Ninth Circuit sets standards for issuance of "antisuit" injunctions and holds enforcement of forum selection clauses outweighs notions of comity. > Read More
Anti-Suit Injunction. District Court grants anti-suit injunction in connection with dispute arising from contract with choice of New York forum clause. > Read More
Arbitrability. Where parties fail to specify that a law other than the Federal Arbitration Act will apply to the issue of arbitrability, the Act will apply and federal law will govern. > Read More
Arbitration by Non-parties. Removal. District Court holds there was removal jurisdiction because the case fell under the New York Convention and that a non-party could compel arbitration under agency principles. > Read More
Arbitration. Personal Jurisdiction. Post-arbitration personal jurisdiction analysis under state long-arm statute is not limited to facts determined by arbitrators but instead must consider whether underlying claim arose from contract that provided for arbitration. > Read More
Choice of Law. District Court applied Israeli law in a dispute over stolen property, as Israel was the place where the stolen property was sold and purchased. > Read More
Comity. Forum Non Conveniens. Paris Convention. District Court holds that simultaneous Chinese proceedings are no bar to U.S. proceedings, and that the Paris Convention does not extend the Lanham Act to include misappropriation of trade secrets. > Read More
Diversity. District Court holds that a foreign corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and principal place of business, resulting in dismissal for lack of diversity jurisdiction. > Read More
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Commercial Activity Exception. Fifth Circuit determines that the actions of a foreign state's agent can subject the foreign state to a U.S. court's jurisdiction under the FSIA's commercial activity exception only if the agent is acting with actual authority. > Read More
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. District Court holds that (1) the clearing of redemption warrants through a New York branch does not constitute a direct effect in the United States sufficient to invoke the commercial activity exception; and (2) the agreement of an instrumentality of a foreign state to a non-exclusive forum selection clause does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity. > Read More
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Indispensable Parties. The Philippines was a "needed" party under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but was not an indispensable party to an action where it had no practical likelihood of enforcing its rights. > Read More
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Relief from Judgment or Order. D.C. Circuit reverses district court's denial of Rule 60(b) motion on ground that Congo's failure to timely respond was the result of "excusable neglect." > Read More
Forum Non Conveniens. Sixth Circuit vacates district court's order dismissing Plaintiff U.S. citizen's claims on grounds of forum non conveniens. > Read More
New York Convention. Fifth Circuit affirms holding that removal jurisdiction was proper. > Read More
Personal Jurisdiction. Venue. District Court holds that it has no personal jurisdiction but grants request for transfer of venue. > Read More
Securities Exchange Act. Foreign Issuers. Second Circuit Affirms Anti-Fraud Exemption of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for Foreign Private Issuers. > Read More
Service of Process. Court permits service of process by publication on a defendant in Pakistan.
> Read More > Back to Top
|
|
 |
Privacy Policy
This e-mail was sent by: North American Litigation Practice Group 130 E. Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601
|
|
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.
This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.
If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/f9088tUV702694P8964
|
|
|