International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|July 2006|Volume 5 Issue 5|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

Welcome to the July 2006 issue of the International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other matters of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.

If you would like to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters, please click on the "subscribe" link to the left and select the newsletters that interest you.

Regards,

David Zaslowsky
Co-Editor

Grant Hanessian
Co-Editor


New Resource Tool

Our new online guide, Dispute Resolution Around the World, provides an overview of the legal profession and court systems in 40 jurisdictions.

 

> Read More     > Back to Top


Articles
The Race to the Courthouse in the EU

Our featured article looks at a provision of an EU Council Regulation that can operate to create a "race to the courthouse" in member countries of the EU. The article was written by Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.

 

> Read More     > Back to Top


Case Summaries

Alter Ego Doctrine/ Piercing the Corporate Veil. The Government of Turkmenistan is the alter ego of its corporate entity and thus liable for a breach of the entity's contract.
> Read More

Anti-suit Injunctions. Comity. Ninth Circuit finds that interests of comity do not preclude court from issuing a permanent injunction when foreign proceeding was merely an attempt to relitigate a dispute that had already been decided by a competent court in the US.
> Read More

Anti-suit Injunction. Southern District of New York rejects comity arguments and grants injunction where the relationship between different parties is at issue in the foreign court.

> Read More

 

Arbitration. Consolidation of Proceedings. Whether or not to permit consolidation of arbitration is a procedural matter for the determination of the arbitrators, not the courts.

> Read More

 

Attachment. Second Circuit holds that district courts have no discretion to depart from statutory criteria in determining whether to grant motions for attachment.

> Read More

 

Conflicts of Laws. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Parens patriae. No conflict found between New York and Ecuadorian law regarding parens patriae doctrine.

> Read More

 

Diversity Jurisdiction. District Court denies Defendants' motion to dismiss where Plaintiff satisfies principal place of business test to qualify as Cayman Island corporation in diversity with New York Defendants.

> Read More

 

Enforcement of Arbitral Awards. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. District Court refuses to enforce an arbitral award that had been vacated by a foreign court where the foreign judgment did not violate U.S. public policy. U.S. courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction over breach of contract claims against a foreign sovereign where there is no commercial nexus to U.S.

> Read More

 

Enforcement of Foreign-Country Judgments. "Last-in-time" rule regarding enforcement of conflicting foreign judgments inapplicable where foreign court does not provide full opportunity to argue res judicata effect of first country's judgment.

> Read More

 

Federal Arbitration Act. Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate Jurisdiction. Second Circuit holds that denial of a motion to compel a subpoena in aid of arbitration is immediately appealable. The Federal Arbitration Act does not permit the nationwide service of process of subpoenas.

> Read More

 

Forum Selection Clauses. Forum selection clause is mandatory and encompasses Plaintiff's tort claims in addition to its contractual claims.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Fifth Circuit holds that a foreign state's agent must possess the actual authority, rather than merely apparent authority, of the foreign state in order to trigger the commercial activity exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Korean agency is an organ of the state and thus immune from suit in the United States.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Prejudgment Attachment. Adoption of New York Convention and submission to UNCITRAL Rules not a waiver of immunity from prejudgment attachment.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Second Circuit holds that immovable property exception to the FSIA provides jurisdiction to hear the City of New York's action against a foreign government stemming from unpaid real property taxes.

> Read More

 

International Comity and Forum Non Conveniens. International comity or forum non conveniens cannot be used to justify dismissal of Canadian family's claims arising in Egypt against a U.S. company where the Egyptian Government has never objected to the adjudication of the controversy by U.S. courts, and where Plaintiffs have legitimate and substantial reasons to seek relief in U.S. courts.

> Read More

 

Personal Jurisdiction. Agency activities of subsidiary in New York sufficient to confer jurisdiction over parent under agency theory.

> Read More

 

Removal Jurisdiction. Federal Arbitration Act. Federal Arbitration Act grants removal jurisdiction to federal courts where party raises a defense under the New York Convention.

> Read More

 

Service of Process. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 requires service of process on a foreign defendant pursuant to the Hague Service Convention.

> Read More

 

Venue. Forum Selection Clause. District Court dismisses breach of contract under action due to forum selection clause and prior pending action under the first-to-file rule.

 

> Read More    > Back to Top

 

Privacy Policy

 

This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group
130 E. Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL 60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/l8088j70aX98Fz992