International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|March 2005|Volume 4 Issue 3|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter 

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

March 2005
Volume 4, Issue 3

 

In this Issue

 

Articles

Case Summaries

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 

Related Links

North American Litigation Practice Group Web Site

 


 


Welcome to the March 2005 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other matters of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

 

If you have any questions about the matters discussed below, or suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to us by clicking on one of our email links below.

 

Please click here to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters.

 

Regards,

 

David Zaslowsky

Co-Editor

 

Grant Hanessian

Co-Editor


Article

 

Forum Non Conveniens: Determining the Adequacy of an Alternative Forum


In various contexts, American courts find themselves in the uncomfortable position of having to pass judgment on the adequacy or fairness of courts of other countries. Our featured article looks at the type of evidence courts have relied on in determining this issue. Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office wrote the article.
> Read More   

 

> Back to Top


Case Summaries

 

Act of State Doctrine. Alien Tort Claims Act. Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Service of Process. Torture Victims Prevention Act. Falun Gong practitioners granted default judgment against Chinese officials on claims for declaratory relief for human rights violations under the ATCA and TVPA.

> Read More

Arbitration. Anti-Suit Injunctions. Second Circuit refuses to enjoin Mexican company from pursuing litigation in Mexico, notwithstanding contractual agreement to arbitrate in New York.

> Read More

Arbitration. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards. By appearing and filing counterclaims in a foreign arbitration, respondent waived its objection to the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction and its rights to have a court determine the validity of the agreement to arbitrate.

> Read More

Arbitration. Subject Matter Jurisdiction under Federal Arbitration Act. Federal court dismissed, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, action seeking a declaration of the preclusive effect of a prior judicial decision confirming an arbitral award since the action concerned the effect of the prior judicial decision and not the underlying arbitral award.  

> Read More

Discovery. District court compels a California company to produce documents in the possession of its German parent in a breach of contract and trade secret misappropriation case. 

> Read More

Foreign Judgments. Date of filing controls exchange rate to determine amount in controversy for subject matter jurisdiction purposes. 

> Read More

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
Fifth Circuit determines that amount payable to foreign state is immune from attachment under FSIA absent proof that funds will be used for commercial activity. 

> Read More

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Ninth Circuit affirms foreign sovereign immunity as to an agency of the Canadian government, but not as to its wholly-owned subsidiary. 

> Read More

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Act of State Doctrine. Forum Non Conveniens. Personal Jurisdiction. District Court partially dismisses claims against the Republic of Azerbaijan and Swiss bank arising out of purported program to privatize state oil company. 

> Read More

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Retroactive Application. Second Circuit holds that the FSIA applies where defendant is a foreign state or agency or instrumentality at the time of suit, even though the alleged tort was committed when defendant was a private company and before the FSIA was enacted. 

> Read More

Joinder of Foreign Parties. Actions for copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation can be brought against any tortfeasor; Hong Kong manufacturer was not an indispensable party in such action. 

> Read More

Personal Jurisdiction. District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction over Austrian manufacturer that lacked direct contacts with Colorado; presence of subsidiary in forum was insufficient to confer jurisdiction. 

> Read More

Personal Jurisdiction. District Court for District of Columbia declined to exercise personal jurisdiction over US and foreign companies (including a US company with an office in the forum) in an action concerning the operation of a gold mine in Peru. 

> Read More

Temporary Restraining Order. Removal and Change of Venue. District Court vacates TRO issued by state court, denies motion to remand and grants motion to transfer case to the Southern District of New York.

> Read More  

 

Torture Victim Protection Act. Alien Tort Claims Act. District Court determines that Salvadoran captain is liable for death of El Salvador's Archbishop Romero in 1980, and enters default judgment for $10 million. 

> Read More

 

Trademark. The Ninth Circuit establishes a two-part test to determine if a foreign mark qualifies for the famous-mark exception to the territoriality rule under trademark law.

> Read More   

 

> Back to Top

Privacy Policy

This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group

130 E. Randolph Drive

Chicago, IL  60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/t90g810072D71LT62g