International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter|September 2004|Volume 3 Issue 6|

International Litigation & Arbitration

 Newsletter

 North America
Baker & McKenzie

September 2004
Volume 3, Issue 6

 

In this Issue

 

Articles

Case Summaries

Contributors

 

View Entire Newsletter

 

 

Related Links

North American Litigation Practice Group Web Site

 


 


Welcome to the September 2004 issue of the International Litigation and Arbitration Newsletter. This newsletter is an electronic bi-monthly publication distributed by Baker & McKenzie's North American Litigation Practice Group that provides summaries of recent decisions and other points of interest in the area of international litigation and arbitration.

 

If you have any suggestions for improving the Newsletter, please forward any comments to me by clicking on my email link below.

 

If you would like to subscribe to other Baker & McKenzie newsletters, please click on the "subscribe" link to the left and select the newsletters that interest you.

 

Thanks,

 

David Zaslowsky

Editor


Articles

 

Our first featured article has an in-depth look at the Supreme Court's recent decision concerning international discovery under Section 1782. It was written by

Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky of our New York office.

> Read More

 

Our second featured article concerns a recent decision from England that gave the most comprehensive judgment to date on the relationship between alternative dispute resolution procedures (ADR) and litigation. It was written by Chris Newmark and Andrea Dahlberg of our London office.

> Read More    > Back to Top


Case Summaries

 

Anti-suit Injunction. Court refuses to issue anti-suit injunction.

> Read More

 

Arbitration. Arbitrary Award. Fifth Circuit reverses district court's vacatur of award on the ground that, as the FAA is interpreted in the Fifth Circuit, arbitrariness and capriciousness are not proper grounds for vacatur.

> Read More

 

Arbitration. Motion to Stay. D.C. Circuit affirms lower court's decision to dismiss motion to compel arbitration against a party who brought suit in another country.

> Read More

 

Canadian Law. Foreign Judgment. Canadian appellate court affirms trial judgment that recognized and enforced a judgment of a court in Illinois, even though an agreement between the parties contained an arbitration provision that provided that the parties were to refer all disputes to arbitration.

> Read More

 

CISG. Buyer required to pay when there was no timely inspection of allegedly non-conforming goods.

> Read More

 

Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act. North Carolina court refuses to recognize a Honduran judgment entered in violation of a severance agreement.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. D.C. Circuit reverses district court and holds that sovereign immunity is waived against original party to contract and against companies that became parties to the contract through amendments thereto.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Terrorism Claim. Fifth Circuit holds that Iranian assets could not be used to satisfy judgment.

> Read More

 

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Fourth Circuit reverses dismissal under the FSIA.

> Read More

 

Forum Non Conveniens. Second Circuit affirms order dismissing on grounds of forum non conveniens a complaint against a German Bank brought by a U.S. citizen residing in Texas.

> Read More

 

Jurisdiction. Court holds it is not "insubstantial and frivolous" to assert that federal common law should provide a private cause of action for violations of customary international law to support federal question jurisdiction.

> Read More

 

Section 1782. Second Circuit affirms denial of 1782 application.

> Read More

 

Stay of Litigation. Fifth Circuit reverses the district court and remands for entry of an order staying litigation pending the outcome of an arbitration.

> Read More    > Back to Top

 

Privacy Policy

This e-mail was sent by:
North American Litigation Practice Group

130 E. Randolph Drive

Chicago, IL  60601

Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm.

This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Before you send e-mail to Baker & McKenzie, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.

If you wish to opt out of these communications, visit: http://bakerxchange.com/vtu/us6889k96pxJVw4